Posted 36 minutes ago

should-be-sleeping:

imaginarycircus:

image

Remember calming cat? Remember when tumblr was this color? If you don’t that’s fine. I just feel old and alone.

You’re never alone. There is always calming cat.

Posted 4 hours ago

vickyvicarious:

Every scrap of paper was gone, and with it all my notes, my memoranda, relating to railways and travel, my letter of credit, in fact all that might be useful to me were I once outside the castle. I sat and pondered awhile, and then some thought occurred to me, and I made search of my portmanteau and in the wardrobe where I had placed my clothes.


The suit in which I had travelled was gone, and also my overcoat and rug; I could find no trace of them anywhere.

The items Dracula takes have some fun implications. Regardless of whether you think he rushed off to steal these things as soon as he locked Jonathan in the study last entry, or if you think he took them a few days later, he has two clear goals here: prevent Jonathan from writing, and more importantly prevent Jonathan from leaving. Both point to him having a fear of losing control of the situation.

Sure, this escalates the mental torture. But it also suggests that, after seeing Jonathan’s shorthand letter, Dracula became aware that his guest is more resourceful than he expected. Jonathan has access to at least one kind of knowledge which Dracula does not. There could be others (in fact, there is the diary). So. He takes away his writing materials - he won’t be able to write any more coded letters. But Jonathan does still have access to paper as long as he has access to the study. If he’s very resourceful he could rip pages out of a few books, fold up notes, maybe craft a sort of envelope by folding paper. It’s not nearly as likely but it isn’t impossible. The other aspect of preventing Jonathan from getting a message out is probably to keep a closer eye on him, to isolate him further from the people around him.

But he’s already tried to send one letter. He arrived in the castle weighed down with anti-vampire gifts. Whatever language barrier he has is obviously not enough to keep him from receiving aid from the locals should he get out somehow - and after the incident with him encountering the vampire ladies as well as this letter, Dracula is no longer just assuming Jonathan can never get out. He is taking precautions to ensure he won’t get far when he does.

He won’t be able to get money with his letter of credit. He won’t have access to his notes about the surrounding area or the dictionary that helped him to communicate better. He won’t know where to go or when to get on a train heading far away from here. And more than that - he won’t have his travel clothes, he won’t have his coat and rug (basically a travel blanket to keep you warm). This might make him less likely to try an escape, which is a bonus, but the focus is on ensuring Jonathan cannot get out of Dracula’s reach. He will be slowed down enough - by weather, by difficulty communicating, by uncertainty about where to go - that Dracula can catch up to him and stop him.

If needed, of course. It’s not to say that this will be needed, and certainly Dracula would prefer it not to be, because that would spell a firm end to this game. But he now feels the need to prepare for such an eventuality. It’s not just about stepping up the encroachment on Jonathan’s space/privacy/belongings. That’s a bonus for sure! But taking these things also points to him feeling threatened to some degree.

And not just by Jonathan, either. If his control over the locals were as complete as he presents it, I don’t think he would be this worried. But his actions here actually support the interpretation that he was bluffing when he implied that the man to whom Jonathan entrusted his letter sold him out. Or at the very least, Dracula doesn’t have confidence that everyone would sell Jonathan out. He fears that they might take a message, so he has to steal his writing materials. He fears that Jonathan might find a way out of the castle, so he ensures he won’t get far.

Implying that the Romani who work for him will never help Jonathan is intended to build a sense of isolation in Jonathan. He wants to erode trust, to make Jonathan feel like he cannot rely on anyone else (except his friend Dracula, who protects him from worse dangers). That means, even if they did want to help him, he will try to make Jonathan think no one is even interested in doing so. It means he will keep him separated from them as much as possible. It means that he will do anything to break down trust and ensure Jonathan cannot access a support system.

Because if he has no support system, then if (when) he tries to escape he will have to do so all alone. And without the things Dracula took from him today, it’s not likely that he will get very far. Not before Dracula catches up to him, anyway.

.

A few more spoilery notes below the cut:

Keep reading

Posted 13 hours ago

theodoradove:

sometimes i am struck by the fact that there are people i follow on tumblr because we were friends on livejournal TWENTY YEARS AGO

Posted 14 hours ago
Posted 14 hours ago
Posted 14 hours ago
Posted 15 hours ago

marshmeowllows:

Man, the song in the August 4th episode…I could picture the captain, alone on his ship, as the memories of his crew appear as apparitions around him.

Posted 15 hours ago

thesoldiersminute:

image
image
image

Cillian Murphy | Red Lights
2012 | Rodrigo Cortés

Posted 15 hours ago

Dear Neil,

when are we going to see YOU🫵 doing the apology dance for the way you ended the season hmm?

damiancrowley asked

dduane:

neil-gaiman:

I only apologise for things I’m sorry for having done.

And why should he be sorry? He’s doing his job.

(Not that @neil-gaiman in any way needs me standing up for him. But this is what it’s right to do for your friends… sometimes more when they don’t need it than when they do.)

It’s a storyteller’s job to make their listeners feel things. And the things won’t always be positive! Nor is this at all a new kind of behavior.

Sort of, oh, three and a half thousand-and-a-bit years ago, Homer (or the collective of poets and writers we now refer to under that name) tells us in the Odyssey how Odysseus, cast up after numerous disasters on the shores of the friendly and tech-savvy* Phoenicians, is thrown a big feast by his hosts. As was normal for such events, the city’s greatest bard is brought in to sing in the guest’s honor. Demodocus the bard, as it happens, sings tales of the Trojan War that leave Odysseus (not just once, but twice) hiding his face in his cloak to attempt to conceal that he’s crying like a baby—not just over the awful things that happened, but his [often terrible] role in them during the war.)

What’s noticeably missing from the “background voice” in these passages of the Odyssey is any sense that, in storytelling, it’s bad to upset your story’s listeners (either inside the narrative or outside it). It’s assumed, by these oldest and consummate storytellers, that this is a completely normal part of the procedure. So old a tradition in Western drama, therefore, is violated at a newer storyteller’s peril.

And here, as always, structure is everything. Tolkien (when discussing it) suggests that without the shared pain of the drama in a story’s midsection, the eucatastrophe or “upward turn” that would make it all worthwhile at the end—or make it “earned”, in modern idiom—would fail, leaving no one satisfied.

If at this point in Good Omens 2 (which we know to be a midsection leading to the material that Neil and Terry plotted out together), if we’d been left not giving a damn what happened with the two protagonists… then we’d know we were in big trouble.

As it is, plainly we’re not. Neil, to the viewership’s general anguish, has straightforwardly left us not knowing how the hell the Angel and the Demon are going to come out of this mess and find their way to the kind of place where we want them to be at the end.

And this is exactly as it should be. We’re all writhing! (And I’m guessing most of us who also do this kind of work for a living are both applauding Neil and cussing him out. Jeeeeeeeeez you should have heard me the other night! …But I know (at least in a general sense) what he’s up to.) What’s important is that Neil’s not doing this because he hates us. He’s doing it because he’s serving that higher power, Story… which requires that for best effect, he drag us down deep before he boosts us up high.

So our job now is to embrace feeling the pain Neil’s (and John’s!) gone to the trouble to craft. The better and more completely we feel it, the more glorious it’s gonna be when everything comes out into the light on the far side of the horrific heartrending crap that Neil and John are doubtless about to put us through the other side. And as usual, the Greeks had a word for it: katharsis. It is, essentially, what one needs to pass through to get one’s emotional money’s worth out of drama… and this team is clearly intent on us getting value for money. May take a while, circumstances being what they are: but I for one feel sure it’ll be worth the wait. And I for one am also entirely willing to see what prestidigitation they enact in part 3.

…Now if everybody’ll excuse me: I’ve got to go start another watchthrough… and then, in the morning, go put my own characters through some more crap. :)

*What Homer describes is apparently some kind of telepathic bond between the Phoenicians and their ships that helps their craft sail where they ought to go. These days we’d call it active GPS. The Phoenicians seem to have managed it it without satellites… so you tell me what I should be calling it. …But then again I’ve got my mind made up, so you might as well spare the effort. :)

Posted 16 hours ago

myjetpack:

A cartoon. The title: 'Coming soon! Classic novels improved by Artificial Intelligence" The image is of five books. The titles are: "Android of Green Gables" by L M Montgomery "A Suitable Bot" by Vikram Seth "Portrait of the Automaton as a Young Machine" by James Joyce "Tech of the D'Urbervilles" by Thoms Hardy  "My Family and other Algorithms" by Gerald DurrellALT

My cartoon for this week’s Guardian Review.

Posted 16 hours ago

royalenat:

“We’re stronger in the places that we’ve been broken.”-Ernesr Hemingway.
•Artwork by Ishmael Randall•

Posted 17 hours ago

libartz:

Me: *scrolling tumblr*

Castiel: I love you

Me: Dear god what’s happened now

Posted 17 hours ago

ms-demeanor:

uvradical:

foxgirlsounds:

spandexinspace:

I need everyone to know that the ship Götheborg, the world’s largest ocean-going wooden sailing ship, answered a distress call the other day.

image

Imagine waiting for the coast guard or whatever to show up and instead a replica of 18th century merchant ship pulls up and tows you to the coast.

image

pov: you’ve been transported to the 17th century

#in the article it says that the sailboat sailors were concerned because they could not be towed quickly because of the kind of boat#so they asked Götheborg what type of ship they were and warned that they would not be able to go above a certain speed#and götheborg went ’ we are also a sailboat. 50 meters length. no worries :) ’#and the poor sailboat sailors were just like ’ That’s not possible. they have to be messing with us’ and then the ship Rolled Up (via bunjywunjy)

I’m crying. Here’s a photo of a sailor from the Götheborg watching over the little sailboat in tow:

image

From the story:

We repeatedly emphasized that we were aboard a small 8-meter sailboat, but the response was the same each time: “We are a 50-meter three-masted sailboat, and we offer our assistance in towing you to Paimpol.” We were perplexed by the size difference between our two boats, as we feared being towed by a boat that was too large and at too fast a speed that could damage our boat.

The arrival of the Götheborg on the scene was rapid and surprising, as we did not expect to see a merchant ship from the East India Company of the XVIII century. This moment was very strange, and we wondered if we were dreaming. Where were we? What time period was it? The Götheborg approached very close to us to throw the line and pass a large rope. The mooring went well, and our destinies were linked for very long hours, during which we shared the same radio frequency to communicate with each other.

The crew of the Götheborg showed great professionalism and kindness towards us. They adapted their speed to the size of our boat and the weather conditions. We felt accompanied by very professional sailors. Every hour, the officer on duty of the Götheborg called us to ensure everything was going well.[…]

This adventure, very real, was an incredible experience for us. We were extremely lucky to cross paths with the Götheborg by chance and especially to meet such a caring crew.

Dear commander and crew of the Götheborg, your kindness, and generosity have shown that your ship is much more than just a boat. It embodies the noblest values of the sea, and we are honored to have had the chance to cross your path and benefit from your help.

“Our destinies were linked for very long hours” is just knocking me out.

Posted 17 hours ago
Posted 17 hours ago

wonderwyrm:

Terry Pratchett knows how to fill a moment with emotion.

Earnest, fervent, sincere emotion. Joy, humor, horror, sadness, all of them at once. Terrible, terrible things happen to the characters in his books, and yet they’re funny to the point that I think they’re mostly branded as comedy.

At the same time, I can easily see most of his books being recreated as horror stories. God, I would love to look more at the ways he creates terrifying situations.

And even during those horrifying moments, he still manages to work in a joke, and you want to laugh as you frantically turn the next page to see if the protagonist makes it out alive. I have no doubt that he might kill off a main character moments after poking fun at their name, and both moments would come across as entirely sincere.

Specifically I want to bring up an example I just came across. I’ve been going through his books in chronological order and I just got to Going Postal (spoilers ahead) and I can see why so many people have this book as their favorite.

Our main character, Moist, has been unwillingly appointed Postmaster, and the old Post Office is filled with decades of undelivered mail. It’s revealed to him, over the course of a few chapters, that the undelivered mail speaks to people, and the collective spirits of those hundreds of thousands of undelivered letters are restless and angry and trapped.

I’d like to make a note that I think this is the first time Pratchett has used magic in this particular way. Discworld has the Magic-Themed books, and the Not Magic books, and while there are occasional overlaps, for the most part Magic is used as a foil and satire for classic magical stories, or as a way for Wizards and Witches to tell their stories. Theclosest I can remember Magic happening to this is in Moving Pictures, where the Holly Wood spirit escapes into Discworld and infects the people there to start making movies, and this mostly subtle and seems a way for Pratchett to make a note of how insane it is for us to treat movies and actors and the whole business of making them in the way we do.

I’m actually rather pleased that he chose The Mail to be something that is just… magic. Unexplained, powerful, something that makes sense and yet doesn’t. Maybe that will change as I get further in the book.

To the moment I’m thinking of. Moist has just been declared Postmaster, and now he’s confronted, in the dark, by the spirits of the mail. They ask him if he will do his job, if he will move the mail again. He says that he isn’t worthy, and the mail says that they just need someone, anyone who will help them.

So Moist says he will. He will do it.

Then the mail, all the hundreds of thousands of unsent letters, say

Deliver Us

And this is what I’m talking about. This is a climatic moment, a moment where Moist is making big changes in his life, in what he is deciding to do. You can feel the desperation of the mail to be sent to their destinations, to be freed from this stagnant hell.

Deliver Us

It’s a pun, you see. Because you deliver mail. It gets delivered. A joke, in the middle of this important moment. It’s a pun and an order, to do his job, to let them fulfill their purpose.

And at the same time, it’s a plea. A desperate, angry plea to be set free and given life again, a plea that someone, even someone like Moist, will be their savior and deliver them from their endless purgatory.

Deliver Us

This is what I love about Terry Pratchett.